Meggesto, Crossett & Valerino, LLP

Thoughts on independent doctor exams – by William W. Crossett

I am often asked my thoughts on independent medical exams. I question how any doctor can be considered “independent,” so it is necessary to discern what independent means.

Independence is most often defined as being free from outside control and, in the economic sense, self-supporting. However, assuring that one is free from outside control is always difficult, as independent doctors are asked to render an opinion based on a standard formulated by someone else and paid for by someone else.

In New York, the insurance carrier’s doctor is labeled as an Independent Medical Examiner (IME), but, unfortunately, they are far from independent. Indeed, independent doctors are employed primarily for the purpose of conducting exams at the direction of insurance carriers/employers.  Many of the doctors working as independent medical examiners have a very limited private practice or are semi-retired but perform occasional independent exams.  Others have set up a practice that derives a significant income from doing “Industrial” exams, as well as IME’s. Accordingly, independent doctors certainly bring a bias to the exam to perpetuate a stream of revenue.

In the past, but on rare occasions, the Workers’ Compensation Board (“WCB”) has directed that an “Impartial Specialist” examine the claimant, instead of an independent doctor.

In my experience, the WCB has had difficulty finding a physician to fill the role, especially in Central New York where I practice, as we simply do not have many specialty doctors.

In May of this year, the WCB sought applications for Impartial Specialists, but has not yet announced the results of this search. The semantics of Independent versus Impartial make me chuckle, because the carrier still pays for the exam, and at a higher rate for  an impartial exam than for an independent exam.  Moreover, the impartial doctor is still bound by the standard set by the WCB.

To conclude, I doubt that a truly Independent or Impartial exam exists.  It is my opinion that the system is better served if each party’s doctor were required to defend their position.

Bill_8861_270x163

William W. Crossett IV
Partner

 

Email: crossett@mcvlaw.com

Phone: 315-471-1664

Mr. Crossett concentrates his practice in the representation of Injured Workers. Since 1982, he has regularly appeared before the Workers’ Compensation Board and the Courts of New York. As an advocate for the Injured Worker, he has testified before the New York State Senate and has presented many Continuing Legal Education programs. Presently, Mr. Crossett serves as President of the Injured Workers Bar Association of New York and is an active member of Workers Compensation Law Division of the New York State Bar Association. Read more In 2012, he was inducted as a fellow in the College of Workers Compensation Lawyers. Mr. Crossett practices throughout Central New York with an office in Syracuse.

Print Friendly

workers compensation lawyer basic guide from mcv law near syracuse nyMCV Law Email Sign Up

Workers' Comp. can be complicated and confusing. Now, you can get our 30+ years of experience on your side with a free book on the basics of the NYS Workers' Comp. process. Sign up for our email list to download the book.

Get Free Book

Related posts